Fiona Crawley vs Sahaja Yamalapalli Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

• When evaluating second serve success over the previous six months, Yamalapalli wins 37.16% of points, slightly trailing Crawley, who wins 37.36%. Could this narrow margin affect their gameplay? Perhaps marginally, but it's indicative of their similar performance levels.
• Analyzing return game statistics, Crawley exhibits a stronger recent form, winning 54.39% of opponent second serve points compared to Yamalapalli's 51.13%. Crawley also edges out on first serve returns, capturing 37.72% versus Yamalapalli's 34.18%.
• Under pressure, Yamalapalli has a slight advantage in saving breakpoints with a 46.92% save rate, compared to Crawley's 45.48%.
• Looking at overall match performance over the last year, Crawley leads with a win rate of 60.47%, whereas Yamalapalli has won 55.07% of matches. Will this consistency give Crawley the upper hand?
• Surface preferences show Yamalapalli thriving on clay with a 61% win rate, while Crawley excels on hard courts, boasting a 74% success rate. Given their weaknesses, surface could play a pivotal role.
• Both players have competed in similar level tournaments, with Yamalapalli winning 55% of matches and Crawley 60%. This suggests a competitive balance affected by event level.
• Referring to opponent quality in the past year, Yamalapalli faced stronger competition, with opponents averaging a rank of 360.52, compared to Crawley's 428.56.
• If the match goes to a deciding set, Yamalapalli shows a minimal edge, winning 50% of these sets, slightly higher than Crawley's 47% success rate.
• Yamalapalli is more proficient in converting breakpoints, boasting a 52.9% conversion rate, substantially higher than Crawley's 40.82%. This could be decisive during critical points in the match.

Editorial Prediction (June 21, 2025, UTC):

In this upcoming match, both players bring distinctive strengths, yet certain trends suggest Crawley might have a slight edge. On second serve performance, the players are nearly equal, but Crawley's stronger return stats could prove advantageous.

Crawley's slightly superior breakpoint save percentage may help mitigate tough situations, but Yamalapalli's higher breakpoint conversion rate has the potential to exploit any vulnerabilities in Crawley's serve.

Considering their relative performance over the past year, Crawley's greater win percentage indicates a slightly higher level of recent consistency. However, Yamalapalli's success against tougher opposition could counterbalance this.

While each player's best surfaces differ, specific match conditions will determine their comfort levels.

Overall, given Crawley’s better performance on return and a higher win percentage in recent matches, Crawley is likely to come out as the favorite to win this match.